devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: modules.devfsd needs /dev/scsi/*/part* handling

To: Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: modules.devfsd needs /dev/scsi/*/part* handling
From: Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:33:34 -0700
Cc: Borsenkow Andrej <Andrej.Borsenkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <m2adv6ijdg.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1008885491.6464.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200201150628.g0F6SQf06569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m21ygrurjk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200201152319.g0FNJ5S20314@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m2g057tbsz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200201152353.g0FNr5j21148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1011209242.4046.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200201210108.g0L18uQ17789@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m2adv6ijdg.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thierry Vignaud writes:
> Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> Attached patch is against current Mandrake devfsd.conf. It works just
> >> fine here for SCSI; I'd appreciate anybody testing it for IDE. It is
> >> great because it means we can continue to use compatibility names by
> >> default without endless "hey, why it says no such device!"=20
> >> 
> >> blockdev is garanteed to exist on Mandrake that is currently my concern
> >> :-)
> >> 
> >> many thanks for idea (yes, sometimes you must really read TFM).
> >
> > Well, thanks, but since blockdev isn't available everywhere, I can't
> > really use it in a generic configuration file. However, I wonder if
> > blockdev is actually required. IIRC, merely opening the block device
> > should suffice to trigger media revalidation. Is this not the case?
> > What is blockdev doing that is special?
> >
> > Can you please try to use dd instead in your devfsd.conf file and tell
> > me if that works? An action like this:
> >     EXECUTE dd if=$mntpnt/\1 of=/dev/null count=1
> 
> this would add a dependancy on fileutils. as for mandrake, it's
> required by basesystem package, so it's ok for us. should be the
> same for rh & debian, but a check wouldn't hurt.

I'd first like to establish that this will actually work. Someone
please try this and let me know.

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current:   rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>