| To: | Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel-oops with devfsd on 2.4.17-SMP |
| From: | Raoul Borenius <borenius@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:14:07 +0100 |
| Cc: | devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200201101743.g0AHh2025828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20020107093548.GA763@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200201090606.g0966HZ29892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020109105953.GA1565@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200201101743.g0AHh2025828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.25i |
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:43:02AM -0700, Richard Gooch wrote:
> Hi, Raoul. Another question: when you had the Oops, what kernel
> patches did you have? In particular, did you have the preempt patch?
I use the sources from Debian/sid (kernel-source-2.4.17-1). Their
ChangeLog sais
kernel-source-2.4.17 (2.4.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (closes: #122168, #123471).
* Only set startup to 0 for 21143 (rev 65) in tulip.
* Don't clear BMCR_FULLDPLX bit in tulip_find_mii as it breaks some cards
(closes: #100624).
* Fixed atyfb compilation problem (Tobias Ringstrom).
* Removed obsolete vfat patch.
* Fixed double cache allocation in mount_devfs_fs.
-- Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxx> Sat, 22 Dec 2001 13:41:46 +1100
Would it be better to use a tarball from kernel.org for debugging?
Regards
Raoul
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: devfsd compilation, Richard Gooch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Kernel-oops with devfsd on 2.4.17-SMP, Richard Gooch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kernel-oops with devfsd on 2.4.17-SMP, Raoul Borenius |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kernel-oops with devfsd on 2.4.17-SMP, Richard Gooch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |