devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Default: unsecure

To: Robert Siemer <siemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Default: unsecure
From: Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:31:37 -0600
Cc: devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010920170320N.siemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20010920170320N.siemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Robert Siemer writes:
> Is there any reason to let the default permissions so unrestictive??
> E.g. line printer and scsi tape are world read-/writeable by default!

Of course. Convenience.

> Here you need to change them anyway, so it would be very reasonable
> to start with root.root 600.

What do you mean "here you need to change them anyway"?

> Okay, it's not the fault of devfs core, but why are drivers
> registering their nodes this way?

Convenience. Is there a real problem with the relaxed default? On most
Unix systems I've used, the tape devices are rw-rw-rw-. The sysadmin
does not want to be bothered by user requests "can you please give me
access to the tape drive so I can back up my data?".

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current:   rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>