devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ownership of target of /dev/cdroms/cdroms0 in devfs

To: Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ownership of target of /dev/cdroms/cdroms0 in devfs
From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:35:00 +0200
Cc: Alex Bowley <alex.bowley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, debian-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200109162353.f8GNruh08846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20010904171036.B571@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010905203303.A428A34F1F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200109162353.f8GNruh08846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 01:53, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > Also any permissions related configuration directives in
> > /etc/devfs/conf.d/* will over-ride /etc/devfs/perms (so there's no
> > real need to comment anything out of /etc/devfs/perms unless you are
> > making permissions more restrictive and want to avoid race
> > conditions).
>
> What race conditions are you referring to? Filesystem access to
> entries is blocked until devfsd has finished processing all pending
> events. So no process can ever see an intermediate state. Only devfsd
> and it's children can bypass this block.

OK.  Sorry I wasn't thinking when I wrote the message, I should have known 
that!

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/     Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/       Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/     My home page

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>