| To: | "Richard Gooch" <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH]: ide-floppy & devfs |
| From: | "Kevin P. Fleming" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jul 2001 09:23:20 -0700 |
| Cc: | "Martin Wilck" <Martin.Wilck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "devfs mailing list" <devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linux Kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | LSG, Inc. |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107272127060.16993-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><000701c116f5$8268a820$6baaa8c0@kevin> <200107281215.f6SCFt716350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
<snip> > Are you saying that the two patch conflict? If not, can someone please > verify that both together are safe? Or is your patch a superset? > Actually, the patches are complementary. However, my patch I won't be continuing to work on, as the entire way that partitions are read/validated/passed to devfs/etc will be changed in 2.5, and I've already forwarded this patch over to the maintainer of that code (whose name escapes my memory at the moment). So I'd say don't worry about it from the devfs end, you'll see the changes once 2.5 opens and these changes get merged in to that tree. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: ide-floppy & devfs, Richard Gooch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | devfsd-v1.3.12 available, Richard Gooch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH]: ide-floppy & devfs, Richard Gooch |
| Next by Thread: | devfsd-v1.3.12 available, Richard Gooch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |