| To: | devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: using modules +/- CONFIG_DEVFS_FS |
| From: | Robert Manchester <rmanches@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:29:15 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <20010413005658I.siemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Robert.Siemer@xxxxxx on Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:56:58AM +0200 |
| References: | <20010412223023.9BB6E7288@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010413005658I.siemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
* Robert Siemer (Robert.Siemer@xxxxxx) [010412 15:59]: > From: rmanches@xxxxxxxxxx (Robert Manchester) > > > I would like to compile one module for kernel version xxx have it work > > on both devfs and non devfs systems. Is there something inherently > > wrong in doing this that I am missing? > > Kernel modules are not intended to work for different kernel > configurations (even in the same kernel version). How am I supposed to release binary modules if they only work on the machine that I compiled them on? -rob |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: using modules +/- CONFIG_DEVFS_FS, Robert Siemer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: using modules +/- CONFIG_DEVFS_FS, Jeremy Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: using modules +/- CONFIG_DEVFS_FS, Robert Siemer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: using modules +/- CONFIG_DEVFS_FS, Jeremy Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |