| To: | Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] devfsd, compiling on glibc22x |
| From: | Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 04 Feb 2001 22:51:41 -0800 |
| Cc: | Pierre Rousselet <pierre.rousselet@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Ford <david@xxxxxxxxx>, devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Richard Gooch's message of "Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:31:45 -0700" |
| References: | <3A7383B2.19DDD006@xxxxxxxxx> <3A73C1D8.578AEEE@xxxxxxxxxx> <m3wvbgnnk3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200102050631.f156Vje04234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | drepper@xxxxxxxxxx (Ulrich Drepper) |
| Sender: | owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) |
Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > So why do old binaries (compiled with glibc 2.1.3) segfault when they > call dlsym() with RTLD_NEXT? Even newly compiled binaries (with glibc > 2.2) still segfault. What do you ask me? You wrote the code. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] devfsd, compiling on glibc22x, Richard Gooch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] devfsd, compiling on glibc22x, Richard Gooch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] devfsd, compiling on glibc22x, Richard Gooch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] devfsd, compiling on glibc22x, Richard Gooch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |