devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WARNING] devfs mount default changed

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WARNING] devfs mount default changed
From: Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 13:25:23 -0600
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devfs-announce-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <390C8637.D2ED49D3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200004301902.e3UJ2eW21010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <390C8637.D2ED49D3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Jeff Garzik writes:
> Richard Gooch wrote:
> >   Hi, all. The default mounting behaviour for devfs has changed
> > recently :-(
> 
> Thanks to the default mounting behavior change, people can compile
> devfs into their kernels without being forced to use it.

Of course, they could before as well: just add "devfs=nomount". Your
patch just made it more convenient to some people, at the cost of
breaking existing behaviour (and making it inconvenient to others).

Anyway, I don't really want to argue. I'm not happy about the change,
but the King Penguin has decided, and that's that. Unlike some people,
I won't keep screaming at the top of my lungs for him to change his
mind. I'll just grumble whenever I get a similar bug report ;-)

Hm. Maybe I should add a config option to control the default.

> > If your system no longer boots correctly (a typical
> > message is "Unable to open initial console"), you may have been caught
> > by this change. Look for the boot message:
> > Mounted devfs on /dev
> 
> If there is a script that prints out a message "mounted devfs on /dev"
> but didn't really do so, that sounds like a bug.

I think you reversed the sense of what I wrote. If that message
*doesn't* appear, it's a sign that "devfs=mount" needs to be added.

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current:   rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>