csa
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Two Simple Questions

To: Jay Lan <jlan@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Two Simple Questions
From: Andrew Fant <andrew.fant@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:19:58 -0400
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx>, csa@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <41703C56.3040805@sgi.com>
References: <31770000.1097851964@flux.usg.tufts.edu> <20041015152049.GC873@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com> <41700B10.1070102@sgi.com> <20041015173837.GG873@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com> <20041015174254.GH873@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com> <111360000.1097871666@flux.usg.tufts.edu> <41703754.2040409@sgi.com> <123050000.1097873483@flux.usg.tufts.edu> <41703C56.3040805@sgi.com>
Sender: csa-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
--On Friday, October 15, 2004 14:08:38 -0700 Jay Lan <jlan@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, you were right. But then 'rmmod csa' cleans it up. Just
a workaround until the real fix is released.

I will try to release the fixes later next week. It needs fixes
to both the rpm and kernel patch.

- jay

Ah, ok. Does this mean that CSA has to be used as a module and will break in other strange ways if I have it compiled into the kernel instead?


Andy


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>