--On Friday, October 15, 2004 12:42:54 -0500 Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 12:38:37PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:38:24AM -0700, Jay Lan wrote:
> Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:52:44AM -0400, Andrew Fant wrote:
> >> Wow, activity on the mailing list just as I get CSA installed on my
> >> testbed. My timing gets better and better. I have two questions
> >> for anyone who might have answers
> >> 1) Has anyone gotten CSA to work with LSF under Linux?
> > We had it working with lsf and PBS Pro under the 2.4 kernel. I
> > am not sure if it is working there now.
> Yes, still working! :)
> >> 2) When I use ja, all my reports terminate with a segfault. For
> >> example:
> Did you install job rpm, chkconfig on job, and modify /etc/pam.d/ files
> as noted when you installed job rpm?
> I have not received reports on ja segfault before.
I don't think you can get the job accounting started without the above.
Let me try.
Nope, there must be something else going on. We would need to know
a lot more to help you. I guess we would need to start with kernel
version and patches, job and csa userland versions, glibc version,
and compiler version.
It will probably be easier to get a core dump and just issue 'where'.
That will probably be the best information.
Well, the core dump was less than helpful. The traceback I got was:
#0 0x0e10567b in __register_atfork () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x0e07199f in __cxa_finalize () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x0e01f590 in ?? () from /lib/libm.so.6
#3 0x0e03d600 in ?? () from /lib/libm.so.6
#4 0x0e03d720 in ?? () from /lib/libm.so.6
#5 0xdfffeb18 in ?? ()
#6 0x0e0370d6 in ?? () from /lib/libm.so.6
#7 0x0e01c000 in ?? ()
#8 0x0e0139dc in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#9 0xdfffeba8 in ?? ()
#10 0x0e00afc6 in _dl_rtld_di_serinfo () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
I'm going to try another kernel rebuild and see if that helps.