apache
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: accelerating apache/QSC. (fwd)

To: tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: accelerating apache/QSC. (fwd)
From: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, apache@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008081341580.6890-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-apache@xxxxxxxxxxx
If you check out the mod page for mmap_static, you'll see a little `find`
line they note to include a lot of files within your mmapfile
directive.  It just makes me believe that this is what they want you to do
to have things cached, which seems super kludgy if that's the case for
large sites.  I can't run a huge find on all my accounts when the web
server comes up.  That's lame.  It can't be troo.

-jeremy

> 
> 
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > > overview, or should i continue reading through the actual patch?
> > 
> > It seems that's the only way... perhaps you can document what you get
> > out of the patch? :-)
> 
> haha.  that thing is large.  seems heavily composed of (long) and other
> casts for 64 bit / irix64 portability i assume, but i haven't found much
> beyond that...yet...
> 
> 
> 
> > [server-status]
> > You haven't included relevant parts of your apache.conf (I didn't use
> > the QSC, so I can't comment further).
> 
> hmm, there's not much to it.  i basically use sgi's defaults:
> 
> <IfModule mod_mmap_static.c>
>     QSC on
> </IfModule>
> 
> and my configure did include --enable-module=mmap_static
> 
> i've seen the mmapfile directive with mmap_static, but i was under the
> assumption that QSC handles caching much more automatically and
> dynamically.  if not, what are its benefits?
> 
> still baffled as to what i'm missing.
> 
> -tcl.
> 
> 

-- 

http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>